Table 1. General stand characteristics in under-planted (DR) and clearcut (CR) regeneration treatments of Chamaecyparis obtusa.
Treatment | Species | Stand density (tree ha−1) | DBH (cm) | Height (cm) | Aboveground biomass (kg ha−1) |
2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 |
DR | Chamaecyparis obtusa (C) | 900 (168) | 8.45 (0.94)b | 9.42 (0.99)b | - | 665 (50)a | 17,979 (7,179) | 22,523 (8,610) |
Pinus thunbergii (P) | 275 (85) | 30.2 (0.57) | 31.42 (0.74) | - | - | 90,743 (33,467) | 95,867 (33,611) |
C + P | 1,175 (137) | - | - | - | - | 108,722 (299,48) | 118,396 (29,074) |
CR | Chamaecyparis obtusa | 1,050 (104) | 10.95 (0.38)a | 12.10 (0.41)a | - | 736 (29)a | 32,551 (3,497) | 40,935 (4,604) |
Values in parenthesis are standard error. Different letters between treatments represent a significant difference at P < 0.05.