Table S2. Jeongseon community’s ES perceptions of forest rehabilitation in abandoned mine area.

ES classification from TEEB (2010) ES perception (%) Mean SD
Negative Positive Unknown
Provisioning service Medicinal resource 12.0 76.0 12.0 7.1 3.6
Freshwater 20.0 72.0 8.0 6.2 3.3
Food 36.0 60.0 4.0 5.8 3.4
Raw materials 32.0 56.0 12.0 5.6 3.5
Regulating service Crop pollination 12.0 84.0 4.0 7.2 2.5
Local climate and air quality 0.0 96.0 4.0 8.4 2.1
Biological control 32.0 60.0 8.0 5.8 3.2
Moderation of extreme events 20.0 80.0 0.0 7.8 2.7
Waste-water treatment 16.0 84.0 0.0 7.4 2.4
Carbon sequestration and storage 4.0 92.0 4.0 8.2 2.2
Erosion prevent and maintenance of soil fertility 20.0 76.0 4.0 7.0 3.2
Cultural service Recreation 12.0 88.0 0.0 7.9 2.1
Education value and tourism 8.0 88.0 4.0 7.9 2.5
Aesthetic appreciation 4.0 84.0 12.0 7.9 3.3
Mental and physical health 4.0 96.0 0.0 9.0 1.4
Spiritual experience and sense of place 20.0 72.0 8.0 6.1 3.4
Habitat service Habitats for species 16.0 80.0 4.0 6.9 2.9
Maintenance of genetic diversity 8.0 88.0 4.0 7.7 2.5