Table 5. A newly established production system adjusted to the harvest target reflecting the growth characteristics of Chamaecyparis obtusa plantations
Thinning prescriptions | Thinning methods | DBH(cm) | Height(m) | Stand density(trees・ha−1) | Volume(m3・ha−1) | Thinning intensity(%) |
no. | age | before/after |
A | 1st | 15 | before | 12.4 | 9.6 | 2,704 | 142.2 | 40 |
after | 14.4 | 9.6 | 1,622 | 117.2 |
2nd | 23 | before | 17.1 | 13.0 | 1,546 | 210.5 | 40 |
after | 20.0 | 13.0 | 927 | 173.1 |
3rd | 37 | before | 23.7 | 17.5 | 884 | 310.9 | 30 |
after | 26.6 | 17.5 | 619 | 273.0 |
4th | 53 | before | 29.7 | 21.3 | 598 | 401.8 | 30 |
after | 33.2 | 21.3 | 419 | 352.9 |
B | 1st | 18 | before | 12.4 | 9.6 | 2,706 | 141.7 | 40 |
after | 14.4 | 9.6 | 1,623 | 116.6 |
2nd | 27 | before | 16.8 | 12.6 | 1,556 | 199.5 | 30 |
after | 18.8 | 12.6 | 1,088 | 174.4 |
3rd | 39 | before | 21.4 | 15.8 | 1,048 | 269.9 | 30 |
after | 23.9 | 15.8 | 733 | 236.3 |
C | 1st | 22 | before | 12.3 | 9.4 | 2,714 | 137.6 | 45 |
after | 14.6 | 9.4 | 1,493 | 108.1 |