Table 2. Efficiency analysis results for each natural recreation forest before COVID-19 (2019).
Sortation(DMU) | Technical Efficiency(CCR) | Pure Technical Efficiency(BCC) | Scale Efficiency(SE) | Reference group | Returns to Scale | Output shortfall(Income) | Output shortfall(Visitor) |
National | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | CRS | - | - |
Public | Incheon | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | CRS | - | - |
Daejeon | 0.3915 | 0.4329 | 0.9044 | 1,2,7 | DRS | 433,559 | 33,375 |
Gyeonggi | 0.6982 | 0.8853 | 0.7887 | 2,7,13 | DRS | 59,850 | 6,415 |
Gangwon | 0.7626 | 0.7751 | 0.9839 | 7,11,13 | IRS | 88,041 | 16,470 |
Chungbuk | 0.8749 | 0.8901 | 0.9829 | 2,7,13 | DRS | 50,259 | 27,142 |
Chungnam | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | CRS | - | - |
Jeonbuk | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | CRS | - | - |
Jeonnam | 0.6654 | 0.6713 | 0.9912 | 7,11,13 | IRS | 139,273 | 41,095 |
Gyeongbuk | 0.5983 | 0.5986 | 0.9995 | 2,7,13 | DRS | 178,071 | 48,519 |
Gyeonnam | 0.8479 | 1 | 0.8479 | 11 | IRS | - | - |
Jeju | 0.8814 | 0.8865 | 0.9942 | 1,2,7,13 | DRS | 54,308 | 8,996 |
Private | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | CRS | - | - |
Geometric mean | 0.825 | 0.857 | 0.961 | | | 77,182 | 14,001 |