Table 3. Efficiency analysis results for each natural recreation forest after COVID-19 (2020).
Sortation(DMU) | Technical Efficiency(CCR) | Pure Technical Efficiency(BCC) | Scale Efficiency(SE) | Reference group | Returns to Scale | Output shortfall(Income) | Output shortfall(Visitor) |
National | 0.679 | 0.7998 | 0.849 | 12,13 | DRS | 60,254 | 39,773 |
Public | Incheon | 0.3786 | 0.4523 | 0.8371 | 6,12,13 | DRS | 179,482 | 98,333 |
Daejeon | 0.2564 | 0.2675 | 0.9585 | 6,11 | DRS | 153,734 | 27,569 |
Gyeonggi | 0.7047 | 0.8683 | 0.8116 | 12,13 | DRS | 41,436 | 61,735 |
Gangwon | 0.7026 | 0.9059 | 0.7756 | 12,13 | DRS | 20,678 | 19,739 |
Chungbuk | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | CRS | - | - |
Chungnam | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | CRS | - | - |
Jeonbuk | 0.9817 | 1 | 0.9817 | 8 | IRS | - | - |
Jeonnam | 0.6079 | 0.6113 | 0.9944 | 6,11,13 | IRS | 77,303 | 12,080 |
Gyeongbuk | 0.7641 | 0.7721 | 0.9896 | 8,11,12,13 | IRS | 46,689 | 9,851 |
Gyeonnam | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | CRS | - | - |
Jeju | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | CRS | - | - |
Private | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | CRS | - | - |
Geometric mean | 0.775 | 0.821 | 0.938 | | | 44,583 | 20,698 |